Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator
1756 points by dang a day ago
1756 points by dang a day ago
Hi all,
Tom Howard is going public as HN moderator today. He has been doing HN moderation work for years already and knows the site and its practices inside-out, so the only new thing you'll see is mod comments from Tom showing up in the threads the way mine do. I'm not going anywhere, so you'll have two of us to put up with going forward :)
I've known Tom since he was sctb's and my batchmate back in YC W09. Many of you know him as the kind and thoughtful community member tomhoward (https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=tomhoward). He's still kind and thoughtful, but he's going to post as tomhow from now on (https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=tomhow), the same way I switched to dang when I went through this rite of passage years ago.
Below is a bit from Tom about himself. Please join me in welcoming him to this new status which he was crazy enough to say yes to!
---
YC and HN have been a huge part of my life for nearly two decades. I read pg's essay How to Start a Startup in 2005 after my friend (and later, co-founder) Fenn found it on Slashdot, and it opened our eyes as to how to go about building products and companies. I first signed up in late 2007, and since then HN has been the place I come to find interesting news and discussions.
Hacker News gave me a window into the big wide world of technology and startups, that had previously seemed so remote and opaque from where I lived (and still live) in Australia. We were lucky enough to be accepted into the W09 batch of YC, and since then HN has been a place where we could share announcements about the startup, but also where I could share the challenges and struggles I experienced in the startup journey and other aspects of life, particularly to do with health and wellbeing.
From the discussions that have happened about these topics I've ended up making enduring friendships with people all over the world, and have been able to learn many things that have improved my life in profound ways. I love HN's ethos - of being a place people come to engage their curiosity. That's what it's always been for me and what I hope I can help it to be for everyone!
--Tom
Many thanks for the warm welcome, everyone. It’s been a privilege to help support this community and to work alongside dang, who has been a great friend and mentor for many years. It’s a great responsibility, to keep HN a healthy and thriving community, and I’m continually amazed to see all the ways dang puts thought and energy into it. One final note is that it was never part of the negotiations that I was expected to know or learn Arc, yet somehow in the onboarding process the HN Arc repo has found its way onto my machine, so it feels like the bait and switch is on… Thank you for doing what you do! I'm sure it isn't easy keeping this place healthy and thriving, but me and so many others really appreciate the blood, sweat and probably a few literal tears it takes :) Not to forget — of course — the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that must've went into cushioning the brain from the occasional nervekiller comment, as well as the endo-/perilymph for the overall "mental balance". One more welcome from another Tom o/ Nice to hear someone else is looking at Arc now as well! Any chance we might see some issues on anarki resolved now? Perhaps https://github.com/arclanguage/anarki/issues/89 would be a good starting point :grin: Jokes aside, its good to see YC cares about community, and looking forward to seeing your nick in the comments. Good luck Indeed, from yet another Tom, glad you're doing what you're doing. HN is the best forum on the internet in no small part due to very active moderation efforts. Welcome, Tom! Thanks for your moderation work so far, and welcome as an official moderator. Glad you'll be helping Dang keeping this an awesome community. Hi, I'm just some young guy but i wanted to thank you for contributing to what makes this site great. It feels to me like this is one of the last bastions of the true news aggregator/comment media of old and i really appreciate everyone who dedicates time to maintaining it. Thanks <3 Tom, what a small world. Seems just like yesterday we were at Inspire 9 together! Thanks in advance, Tom. Never a better time for more smart work in this area. > One final note is that it was never part of the negotiations that I was expected to know or learn Arc, yet somehow in the onboarding process the HN Arc repo has found its way onto my machine, so it feels like the bait and switch is on… I would love it if you could get the current HN code base into a state that it could be open sourced I understand the desire to keep certain aspects “secret sauce” to prevent abuse, but surely that could be addressed with some kind of plugin mechanism and then just don’t open source those plugins All hail our new, most favourite overlord from the British Commonwealth on days ending in "y"! Please rewrite HN as an SPA using the most bleeding edge alpha JavaScript frameworks you can find. The one thing that could improve HN is rendering fonts clientside on to a full screen Canvas element. Then all we need is a client-side framework for interpreting the element's pixels into HTML for screen reader support. I dunno if you got the memo, but we're in 3rd of April now, no more jokes allowed, especially not traumatic ones like those. Reminder for April Fools Day next Year: Get Dang to do a post saying HN is moving to a discord server. Welcome Tom! I want to add to the chorus saying how excellent HN has been for so many years, in large part thanks to the excellent moderation. I dove into forums early on and they have always been one of the favorite and most treasured parts of the internet. It's not an exaggeration to say that HN is one of the best ever. The longevity is commendable, especially in an industry full of fads and flameouts. Dang and Tom, please keep doing what you're doing. Observation: How lucky are we that our contributions here warrant two fine moderators? I just read Tom's brief story on how he arrived here and what it means and felt... I don't really have a quick word for it. I know I am better for having spent time here. Oh, I got it! A tiny bit spoiled, but in the best of ways. Yeah, that is what I felt. How lucky we are indeed. :) Do you have showdead enabled to see how many good comments are being unfairly censored? Otherwise this is just survivorship bias talking. I have! It's very rare that I see a comment being flagged unfairly. Sometimes it appears as unfair to me, but then I try to look from other angles in case it's just my bias. Also, don't forget that it's mainly other users who flag, not moderators. Also also, it's a bit ironic coming from a 3 months old account with already negative karma. I believe HN has a problem with users who create many new accounts and don't bother to understand "what is a good thoughtful comment" and change their behaviour. If you see a good comment in the [dead] state, you don't have to complain about it being "unfairly censored" - you can intervene to fix it by vouching for it. This is in the FAQ: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html. That requires the user to reach the "small karma threshold". Difficult when the user you replied to has negative karma after several months of HN participation. The threshold is 30 karma. Anyone can easily reach that if they want to use HN as intended. I have had showdead enabled for years and I think I can count the number of dead comments that didn't deserve the status on one hand. Same. I turned it on very soon after I setup my account. My own personal tolerance for speech is less aggressive than what we see here on HN. I dislike completely inaccessible history, and basic accountability is why. Works like the trash does. Want to see how people live? Pick through the trash. I suspect that dang has been barely surviving the (e-)moderation-technology debt (Arc notwithstanding). Good to have a second, antipodal, guy take on the burden! Congratulations Tom! Tom (and Fenn) had rockstar status back when I was involved in university CS+Entrepreneurship clubs in Melbourne around 2009/2010 (mostly led by fine students at UniMelb, but I was helping spread the word at Monash) because they were the first(maybe one of the first?) Aussies to be accepted by YC. They always generously gave their time and advice at these student events, even dropped by the SiliconBeach networking meets to share their experiences and turned out to be exceptionally kind human beings in person. Definitely the right choice for moding this community! > He has been doing HN moderation work for years already and knows the site and its practices inside-out, so the only new thing you'll see is mod comments from Tom showing up in the threads the way mine do. I wonder if there are any other secret moderators. If you reach 160'000 karma you can see the secret mods was really hoping the threshold is 65,535 because I'm much more likely to reach it counting backwards. If you flag, downvote, and/or vouch comments, you're basically already a moderator-lite yourself :) Upvoting posts has a moderation-like effect (opposed to that of downvoting). In the classic tradition of thinking that “dang” is pronounced “dang” and not “Dan G.” I propose that we read “tomhow” as “Tomh Ow”. Has Dan ever commented on whether the "dang" pronunciation was intentional? I too, was under the impression he just liked the twanginess of the word. I have people call me Joenot - in reality, this username was chosen decades ago by my mother, pairing Joe (my name) and Not(tawa) - my tiny hometown. Sometimes I wish I'd chosen better but like many names, once it's out there, it tends to stick. If you torture it a bit, you can make it "tomorrow" said with a weird accent. To mh ow > dang” is pronounced “dang” and not “Dan G.” WAIT WHAT?!? How comes your karma points halved? Welcome, Tom! Y'all are making HN a place that I still love to visit every day. I find it awesome how dang et al. not only manage to keep spammers and trolls in check but also actively improve discussions by merging threads and asking people to behave. Would it be possible to give him a new username for this role like “darn”? Then we can continue confusing the beginnings of comments that appeal to authority as interjections. That's a great introduction and a great opening from Tom. HN gets a second public moderator is a good sign. You would have to be crazy to agree to this but I guess brave, too! It's always a site that's had dinner party vibes even tho it's so big. Weird! But the focus on curiosity and healthy is important. I'm sure the features of HN are already extremely well thought out and precisely balanced, but I guess this is as good a time as any to throw out a feature idea: you know how you can favorite stories and comments? I want to favorite users, too. Maybe privately. Because it's like a bookmark thing where I can come back and see what interesting ones are doing. Just makes sense to internalize it as a list rather than externalize it into a browser bookmark list, I think. But then again, maybe a private list or yet another list would be too much! Welcome, Tom! Sometimes I can't believe how good we have it here. Thank you both very much. Welcome, and thanks for striving to keep hn the bastion of intellectual curiosity that it's been in the ~9 years since I joined. I get tremendous value out of this website, and I'm very grateful for the effort you all are putting in to keep it stable. Congrats Tom! Thanks dang and other mods for protecting this sacred corner of the web for so long. You're the guardians of the best no-BS tech news community. It is truly an under-appreciated effort. Best wishes. I've (mostly quietly) enjoyed the "vibe" of HN for well over a decade now. It's certainly a major contribution to maintaining enjoyment in the crazy world of tech. Thank you for your contributions to this community which remains so special to an entire industry. Welcome, Tom! Thanks for supporting this community for so long. Your work is much appreciated! > He's still kind and thoughtful, but he's going to post as tomhow from now on I laughed at this phrasing. Welcome tomhow! Great! Look forward to not noticing anything in particular changing around here. Seriously appreciate this site. I always wondered how HN manages to do moderation 24/7 around the clock. Australia makes sense. A lot of it boils down on dang being oversubscribed. And having some automations to help him What do you mean by “oversubscribed”? Automation, sure. But people need to sleep sometime, and maybe also have some life outside HN, for mental health. ;) I think what comment OP is saying is that dang was working more than was healthy - “oversubscribed” meaning “subscribed above capacity,” i.e. “doing yeoman’s work,” “doing the work of two people,” “that man is like a machine,” “do you ever sleep, dude?” etc Welcome Tom! And thanks Dang for tirelessly looking after the community. HN is one of the last few sane places on the internet :) How does such a large famous forum get by with 1 computer and 2 mods. Theres no spam here. No fighting. How odd for the internet in 2025 XD No images. No reposting. No (public) popularity contest stats. A general vibe against politics posting. There's just not much here to attract the worst kinds of behavior. May we please have another mod based within GMT to round out this follow-the-sun pattern that's slowly rising I'm not sure if I should say "welcome" or "congrats" so maybe a little of both! Moderation is a huge part of what makes HN so valuable, so it's good to hear dang is getting some much needed help as this place apparently won't stop growing Thanks Tom your work is appreciated and I'm sure will be appreciated going forward. There's a whole lot of us here who really value this place, and the many fine minds who share time with us in it, and you're a big part of that. Thanks for the work you guys do, Dan and Tom, to keep this place a good and intellectually stimulating place for discussion. We appreciate you. Congrats Tom. I wonder if a particular model could be used as a baseline for these values or if they are already doing that to check first level prior to a human in the loop? I myself have been using AI for this purpose and have found it getting pretty good. I know its not a replacement for thoughtful moderation however, a tailored model for HN would also promote the tradition of HN in terms of having it not just be about who is there and have it more trained on its best practices to promote consistency, possibly as an aid. Welcome aboard Tom. Thanks to the efforts of dang HN has become an incredible community. I've learned a lot on here and made some great friends. Welcome Tom! I have been visiting this site (almost) daily for 17.5 years now thanks to the wonderful technical community and diligent behind-the-scenes moderation. >I'm not going anywhere, so you'll have two of us to put up with going forward :) I thought that sctb was another one? No longer I guess? I want to say Welcome but Tom has been on HN for so long. I want to say Congrats but moderating HN must have been a painful job. So I guess enjoy, have fun and see you around. :) Congrats, Tom! I’m glad to hear there’s more than one moderator here so you can share the workload and hopefully relax well on your time off. Welcome Tom! Thanks for helping to make this the highest signal-to-noise ratio forum in the general technology/business space. Welcome Tom! Thanks (in arrears and advance) for all the work here; this is the best forum on the Internet, and we owe much of it to you guys. This better not have any impacts on my capacity for mischief and shenanigans... Anywho, welcome tomhow. Congrats Tom! And thanks Dan! (Yes, I've been around long enough to know the "G" is for your last name! :) While tomhow is of course welcome, I want to express gratitude to dang for years of quite fair moderation. I've been around multiple communities and he's nothing like those power-tripping libera.chat or reddit moderators. Congrats and welcome to the new public status! Forgive the non-substantive comment but that's awesome :-) Welcome Tom! Wishing you good luck from this former Reddit mod -- I know how hard the job can be! Right on! Thanks and good luck and please keep the ethos / vibe going the way it improbably has for all these years. I've been active online since about 1998, and HN remains unique in my experience. Kudos as always to dang for the huge role he's played in that. Congratulations Tom. Great to see the antipodes represented on the HN team :) Hi, I'm excited. I'm really wondering if you'll do such an excellent job like dang is doing. This is a really special community, and now it's in your hands as well. Congratulation Tom! :) Thank you for doing what you do here. Appreciate it. One thing that I appreciate about dang, and PG before him, is their intellectual honesty and strong sense of ethics. On the face of it, HN should be terrible. It's a forum owned an investment firm as promotion for their business. But because HN was started by an individual with real values, and has been operated day-to-day by individuals that followed in his tradition, its been capable of unreasonable greatness and real authenticity. At this point, HN is sort of the tail that wags the YC dog. There are a great many seed funds but only one HN. It would be a good thing for the world if HN was spun out as a non-profit and maintained long-term. But in any case, we can all hope that it will at least continue to be stewarded by good people for a while longer. Good luck and thanks! > On the face of it, HN should be terrible. It's a forum owned an investment firm as promotion for their business. I think it's at least as plausible that this is part of the magic that makes it good. HN is sufficiently "on the margin" that they don't have to do things like placate advertisers with their moderation policies. The mods like dang, tomhow and pg mostly care about HN as users rather than owners. > It would be a good thing for the world if HN was spun out as a non-profit and maintained long-term. That sounds good in theory... in practice it might be the beginning of the end. Once there's a non-profit behind it the non-profit has a mission of its own. Although I'm actually not sure of the legal status of HN right now, maybe it's already something like that. > I think it's at least as plausible that this is part of the magic that makes it good. HN is sufficiently "on the margin" that they don't have to do things like placate advertisers with their moderation policies. The mods like dang, tomhow and pg mostly care about HN as users rather than owners. I agreed, and would say its stronger than that. Running HN well is great for Y Combinators reputation, and its focused on a relevant audience. I am sure that has to be very good for them. > Once there's a non-profit behind it the non-profit has a mission of its own. Absolutely. It happens a lot. Over the years I've become quite jaded on non-profits personally. As they tend to appeal to the people who want to pursue an ideology rather than follow the goals of the non-profit. Which usually are at odds. Before even the "has a mission of its own" part, an independent non-profit needs to pay its bills. I suspect that dang & Co. aren't working for free. Similar for servers & internet connections & etc. And I'd bet that few people here want to see ads, or start paying for their accounts. I was there since around 2015 and the evolution of that forum and its population/opinion has been very interesting, to say to put it mildly... Remember when the biggest disagreements were about ORM & Frameworks? I miss those days. I didnt even mind the discussion about the ethics of Uber or Airbnb, but now, now it is different, & not for the better. The whole western world is different and not for the better since 2015.
Erosion of public trust since then is tremendous and regrettable so it is not surprising that we miss the communities that once were. So been here slightly longer and the only shift I can recall is a shift away from business to tech. Early days had a lot more discussion about the business side of startups and vc. Then it started shifting more towards tech too the point now where startup/business discussion is mostly limited to Show/Ask posts. The loss of chatter around the soft skills around tech (so business but also UI/UX design, design patterns, organizational approaches (like holocracy), planning processes, etc) has made HN a lot less interesting IMO. If I just wanted the usual tinfoil hat FOSS BOFH content, then I can go literally anywhere else. Reddit, Matrix, IRC, Telegram, Twitter, Bluesky, Mastodon, they're all full of it. Then there's the widening of scope to big social issues that's a different matter altogether. Is this because many of the soft skills you mention were in flux/being 'disrupted' 15 years ago and since then they've become the accepted norm? I enjoyed that content too but feel like it was a time where startups were changing the face of how companies operated and now most businesses follow those models and they're not yet ripe for change again. I honestly don't know. On the one hand you're right, we were in a time when startups were doing things like experimenting with holocracy. On the other hand, companies and cooperatives are still today experimenting with more efficient, equitable ways to get things done. I feel quite disappointed that so much of the anger over inequality in this community gets aimed at US or international politics rather than discussing things like corporate or cooperative structures which is both more grounded and more easy for many of us as practitioners to action. To me it feels more emotional catharsis than intellectual discussion; getting mad at politics is getting mad at something you can't control and so is more of a way to air out your emotions. Getting mad at corporate structure or envisioning a cooperative is something we can control and requires more rigor to engage with. Been here since 2011 and reading for a few years longer than that. I don't think the site has changed, more that the world has changed (a lot). There isn't that general excitement around consumer tech and programming that there was 15-20 years ago. We've gone from talking about how we need to start teaching coding in schools to how we shouldn't bother because AI will be doing it anyway. The fun has been sucked out of it all. It wasn't all that long ago that we were excited by simple but fun devices like the iPad Nano and Flip camera. Now we all have phones that can shoot Hollywood films, we can access all art every created on them, and we have watches that can save our lives...and we've got a bit too used to it. On top of that around here we used to get excited about scrappy startups raising funding and trying to change the world. Unfortunately because a number of those companies went on to dominate the world in negative ways, exploit users and hoard wealth, people have become jaded and scrappy startups are less exciting because we assume they'll eventually do something loathsome 10 years from now. I'd love more framework debates, excitement, and creativity - but until the wider world is happy and positive again I'm not going to hold my breath. I think HN has been gradually losing what makes it unique. The net is filled with BOFH-style pro-FOSS tinfoil hat tech content and has been since the early '90s. The joke among my college cohort about Slashdot was that IT Helpdesk 1 will have strong opinions on how MSFT execs were engaged in crazy conspiracies. You can find that kind of content anywhere that tech people talk. HN's value proposition for me has always been informed commentary; industry insiders, academics, and practitioners weighing in based on their domain expertise. Today's HN feels a lot more like a rumor mill for random people interested in tech. Along with this shift has been a widening of scope where we don't just talk about tech but also general politics. In general, HN has been gradually trending to be just another big tech subreddit. These days HN reminds me a lot of Reddit r/programming in the early 2010s. To me this isn't a good thing because I used to come to HN to specifically get informed commentary. But there's no way for a site as big as HN to be dominated by informed content anymore because there just aren't that many people working on interesting tech in the world. So I do what most others do I suspect which is talk with friends from my alma mater and old jobs in group chats and share HN links and laugh at the unhinged, uninformed comments. I do think at this point HN has changed its appeal. I feel that people today are attracted to HN because of its raucous, rumor-mill feel rather than informed commentary. I really don't think that HN lets dissenting opinions thrive (well, not anything that is truly controversial but not clearly hateful). That may feel cozy but it's not a reflection of anything pure or good, imo. My experience is that HN's Overton window is probably on average 15-20% larger than most forums. That's not uniform across all topics though. So if you skew toward a particular set of topics it may feel like a typical forum, or even in some ways more constrained. My issue is it seems like something has to only be a bit controversial to be completely hidden from everyone. There was the recent DF article about how Gruber thinks his articles are being artificially shitlisted and I can't help but agree? I don't necessarily think the mods have their fingers on the scale, but I wouldn't be surprised if the algorithm works in a way where if enough people flag something it gets automatically hidden, and there's enough people who see DF and automatically flag it that those blog posts get hidden every time. That site had 11 major frontpage threads in the last year, which is a lot. Every single one of them set off the flamewar detector. That's extremely unusual. If it were one or two I'd call it random, but 11 in a row, whatever the reason, is not random. We turned off that software penalty on about half of those threads. In his article https://daringfireball.net/2025/03/the_website_hacker_news_i... he mentions several times that he is aiming for "comment traction," treating articles with more comments than upvotes as successful while complaining that recently there haven't been as many comments. It does make sense that DaringFireball would consider starting a flamewar a job well done, but of course HN is optimizing for the opposite. HN's "flamewar detector" (I prefer "spiciness indicator") is one of those tools I'd been highly skeptical of, and still have significant issues with, but ... it does in fact work much of the time. It's where it doesn't work that the problems really manifest. I'd come to that conclusion after scraping all "past" front pages from 2006 through May-ish 2023 and doing a number of analyses of that corpus. (I've commented on that a few times here on HN and on the Fediverse.) One of the absolute spiciest discussions ever was a pg post about HN itself. Which suggests that when a topic of of direct interest and familiarity, people will tend to hop on it. There are also a great many flame-y threads, though note that by virtue of making the front page, my sample probably skews to less disastrous threads with the absolute sh*tshows being well below the top-30 fold. Among other weaknesses, spiciness doesn't distinguish between pure troll/clickbait threads, and those on which there's a significant and justified spread of opinion. As such, the metric makes hard discussions even harder to have, though mods can and do turn off the penalty on request (often many hours after the discussion's started, for obvious reasons, which is its own penalty). I do wish that HN could have those discussions, and I've thought and written (both on HN and in emails to mods) about what that might entail. I'm coming to the long-delayed and somewhat regrettable conclusion that it's not the right tool for that particular job. I follow the HN subreddit and routinely see very active threads that aren’t in the feed. Strong disagree here... While there are definitely those that will bury some opinions with downvotes, there are others that will upvote. Conservative, Libertarian, Progressive, Liberal and even outright Communist views get expressed in varying comments and that's just political leanings. I only really recognize this because I'll be actively reading/replying sometimes and see comments go +/- 2-3 up or down votes back and forth on the same comment. While you may be at say -2, that's just the aggregate. I sometimes wish I could see the total up/down votes just out of curiosity. Then you're not spending enough time reading the comments on controversial stories. Disagreement is alive and well on HN. I disagree. People will frequently say that downvoting is not for disagreeing, but in every controversial thread dissenting opinions are quickly downvoted and frequently flagged. Some recover, but many die or end up pushed down into obscurity. Mildly controversial opinions sometimes survive and get discussion, but anything past that rarely get a reply and just get downvoted and flagged into oblivion. This isn't exactly a slight against HN, as this happens basically everywhere past a tiny userbase community. But I don't think it's particularly right to put HN on a pedestal for its ability to handle controversy. There are over 1,200 comments on this controversial story alone, with plenty of debate within: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43517833 What more evidence do you need that spirited disagreement is alive and well here?
tomhow - a day ago
zormino - a day ago
jdthedisciple - 14 hours ago
frainfreeze - a day ago
tombert - 20 hours ago
simonebrunozzi - a day ago
wholinator2 - 8 hours ago
Rodeoclash - a day ago
QuantumGood - a day ago
skissane - 10 hours ago
cantrecallmypwd - 12 hours ago
gadders - 10 hours ago
robertlagrant - 9 hours ago
diggan - 9 hours ago
gadders - 8 hours ago
rurp - a day ago
ddingus - a day ago
BergAndCo - 18 hours ago
AlexeyBelov - 15 hours ago
dang - 14 hours ago
_Algernon_ - 9 hours ago
dang - 7 hours ago
_Algernon_ - 9 hours ago
ddingus - 5 hours ago
gsf_emergency_2 - 13 hours ago
GVRV - 15 hours ago
palmotea - a day ago
Raed667 - a day ago
Full_Clark - a day ago
diggan - a day ago
dragonwriter - a day ago
codetrotter - a day ago
joenot443 - 7 hours ago
DistractionRect - a day ago
gameshot911 - a day ago
dang - a day ago
frainfreeze - a day ago
raphman - a day ago
koolba - a day ago
keepamovin - 17 hours ago
sctb - a day ago
isoprophlex - a day ago
hakaneskici - a day ago
scrapcode - a day ago
noleary - a day ago
interestica - a day ago
edgineer - a day ago
layer8 - a day ago
raverbashing - a day ago
layer8 - a day ago
blackqueeriroh - 19 hours ago
wanderer42 - 17 hours ago
yeahitsgreat12 - 11 hours ago
coldpie - 9 hours ago
aberoham - a day ago
airstrike - a day ago
ddingus - a day ago
SOLAR_FIELDS - 19 hours ago
sebringj - a day ago
rmason - a day ago
dskhatri - a day ago
bisRepetita - a day ago
ksec - a day ago
joe_hills - a day ago
eigenvalue - a day ago
vessenes - a day ago
OuterVale - 20 hours ago
eddyg - a day ago
mathfailure - 21 hours ago
jedwhite - a day ago
jedberg - a day ago
chrisweekly - a day ago
teruakohatu - 13 hours ago
qwertox - a day ago
Akhilmurali - 15 hours ago
theoryofx - a day ago
jdoliner - a day ago
graemep - 11 hours ago
Akronymus - 10 hours ago
bell-cot - a day ago
throw_m239339 - a day ago
Swenrekcah - a day ago
sanswork - a day ago
Karrot_Kream - a day ago
basisword - a day ago
Karrot_Kream - a day ago
basisword - a day ago
Karrot_Kream - a day ago
roflyear - a day ago
jdoliner - a day ago
hbn - a day ago
dang - a day ago
yorwba - a day ago
dredmorbius - 21 hours ago
J_Shelby_J - a day ago
tracker1 - a day ago
otterley - a day ago
xboxnolifes - a day ago
otterley - a day ago