Node2Shell evolves to HTTP2Shell, blast radius affects many HTTP libs and apps

aikido.dev

46 points by theanonymousone 5 hours ago


netsharc - an hour ago

Well, whoever picked the name HTTP2Shell certainly didn't use any intelligence, artificial or genuine.

It's so meaningless, broad and undescriptive of the actual issue. No it probably doesn't affect an HTTP server with nothing else behind it, so why is HTTP being blasted?

You might as well call it Exploit Pro Max...

bawolff - 11 minutes ago

To me, the surprising part is how many of these implement brotli compression of request (not just response) bodies, given how obscure a feature that is.

In any case all this sensationalism is starting to get annoying. Patch your stuff and move on.

Edit: actually, between all the sensationalism, its hard to tell from the article how many of these actually support brotli compressed request bodies in common configs vs some other use of brotli (which is bad but nowhere near as critical)

Rapzid - 12 minutes ago

> reported it as unauthenticated remote code execution that works in both directions

> but it wasn't recognized as a security issue at the time and no release shipped with the fix until now

I'm always getting my dangerous RCE bugs mixed up with my harmless RCE bugs.

I'm curious how this was reported and fixed back in Feb but nobody recognized the importance. A case of AI automation and nobody at the wheel?

flyingjoe - an hour ago

A few month ago, everyone was advising to use cool-downs in your package upgrades. Now we're constantly overriding those because security incidents will be exploited immediately. Guess that's just how it's gonna be from now on.

skeledrew - 3 minutes ago

I've just been pointing a Claude Code at these things as they pop up. A great time to not have to worry about chasing all these things manually.

tetha - 2 hours ago

Well at least we know about it while or before the giant patch effort for everything else goes on. Just put it onto the pile.

Who turned on hard mode this week?

nairboon - an hour ago

Brotli2Shell seems to be a more appropriate name for this.

cowsandmilk - an hour ago

Article claims OpenAI found this in February, but I don’t think that’s correct. I think Google made a change to the Brotli source code in February that fixes the issue, but hadn’t realized it was a security issue and therefore hadn’t cut a release.

giwook - 20 minutes ago

Is this a conservative exploit, because it's owning those libs

upofadown - an hour ago

An example of the cost of added complexity I suppose. Brotli is much more complicated than the gzip/deflate it replaces. ... and of course we still have to expose gzip to attack as well.

Every time you add something you lose something...

jgalt212 - 6 minutes ago

How may web servers only serve brotli?

How many clients only accept brotli?

davedx - an hour ago

Honestly it's time to get rid of C as a language used where security is a factor. Enough already. Why the hell is a lib like brotli that processes public general internet traffic, and maintained by google, not in rust?

est - 2 hours ago

wtf Python is also effected. https://pypi.org/project/brotli/ not sure about shell

TacticalCoder - 18 minutes ago

I really don't understand how so many different things are affected by the same brotli bug/exploit.

I even read the patch for the C code (patch which, btw, seems a bit hacky to me with isSafe? methods added and whatnots but YMMV: now I understand things had to be patched in a hurry but this patch really looks like "lipstick on a buffer overflowing C pig" to me).

What's the link between Python / Node / C++ / libbrotli / Envoy / Bun: are those some all using the same C brotli encoder/decoder?

Can someone who knows more explain why all those are vulnerable?

> As for unaffected software, Apache’s standard mod_brotli does not decode Brotli

Because this one only encodes and doesn't decode and the bug is in the decoder? (for I take it mod_brotli, with such a name, still does something brotli related and isn't, say, a TOTP token generator nor a SAT solver?).

I mean overall, sheesh: could we get better explanation / better writeups when such big fuckups happen?

Zestymarble45 - 2 hours ago

[flagged]