Amiga clarifies Commodore rights and the future of AmigaOS

amiga.com

43 points by odomus 2 days ago


TacticalCoder - 2 days ago

> Forty-two years later, the circle is closing: apart from the "Commodore" and "C=" marks, the principal rights and assets of the Commodore and Amiga eras rest with Amiga.

> Current licensees include A1200.NET, Antstream Arcade, Blaze Entertainment, Cloanto, Commodore, Hyperion Entertainment (and its sublicensees), Retro Games, Simulant Systems, and SpecNext.

So "Commodore" is in the list: hence as I understand it the youtuber from retrorecipes owns the Commodore name and is officially licensed to make C64 and Amiga branded computers.

Quite impressive IMO what this dude managed to pull off.

SillyUsername - 2 days ago

Unfortunately this is at least 2 decades too late now.

Aside from the diehard fans, it's the behaviour between the companies that stopped me buying their products, and I'm probably not the only one.

I applaud it's finally wrapped up but in a rapidly dwindling fan base they were eroding the value of their own brands - brands that should have been complementary.

I hope now they can recover that iconic status, but I feel it's simply going to go the way Atari is iconic now - mostly trendy t-shirts and retro sales.

jnaina - 2 days ago

At this rate, the Amiga will outlive us all, and probably get one last hardware and AmigaOS revision long after our funerals.

snvzz - 20 hours ago

"open source" is the string that's missing in that announcement.

The historical source code (AmigaOS git history up to at least when Commodore went bankrupt) should be MIT and in e.g. github.

But that doesn't seem to be what they have in mind.

The shitshow will likely continue.

CursedSilicon - 2 days ago

I've less than zero love for Commodore stuff, I'll admit up front. Even as a retro computing enthusiast and computer historian I think the adoration that Commodore (both the C64 and Amiga) get far outweighs any practical reasoning of what the machines are capable of

But the thing I've truly struggled to understand, particularly with PeriFractic and his bleating of "I OWN THE COMMODORE NAME NOW!" is just

...who cares? If you like Commodore stuff, great. Do things that make you happy. But does having a C64 with "the commodore name" printed on it owned by some slop peddling youtuber (both in his embracement of LLM's and that bizarre "dumb phone but also not" project) truly change anything for fans?

If you're buying an "A1200 accelerator" does the fact it says "AMIGA" on it make it more valuable than if it just said "68K accelerator" or some other generic term?