Hacker News, Sans AI
elijahpotter.dev147 points by chilipepperhott 5 hours ago
147 points by chilipepperhott 5 hours ago
I can deal with a launch problem. I am looking forward to being able to check it out. I stopped coming to HN as often as I used to because there has been too much AI talk. It's like a dang AI subreddit. I don't want anything to do with AI. I have lost 2 jobs to AI budgets and stupid executive decisions. It's no longer part of my personal and professional life.
I hope it works out.
I agree with you, but haven't really left yet since there's still a good amount of discourse outside AI related topics. Seems a significant amount of contributors here are all to eager to fall over themselves putting themselves, their juniors, children, and colleagues out of work, long term.
My personal stance is that the genie is out of the bottle, and there's likely no putting it back. Kind of like nuclear weapons: I wish they didn't exist, but since they do I'd rather be on the side that has them.
Honestly it's an incredible technology the likes of which I never thought I would see in my lifetime. It's definitely not perfect, but it is improving at a frightening pace. Some days I am optimistic for how it might shape the future, and other days I am scared.
If goverments wanted to make a credible effort to limit how they are used, I would support that. But I'm not terribly optimistic that can or will happen.
TBH, I'm mostly here out of spite at this point. It's unhealthy but I can't seem to stop rage-reading.
Would love to hear more detail about the job losses you mentioned, if you are willing to share.
I've addressed the issues. It should be usable now. I apologize to everyone who encountered an error page. Have a good weekend, everyone!
It’s interesting how, as someone more pro-AI, I feel the exact opposite way - every comment thread just devolves into people saying AI is stupid (OK, perhaps modulo new model releases from frontier labs, those tend to be fairly positive). Like we had a thread about what your AI workflow is and people were coming in and saying they didn’t have one because AI is bad. Really? Do these people enter threads about what your favorite Rust library is and say they don’t have any and Rust is a bad language?
Sure, but not to the same extent. Because the industry isn't experiencing a trend where it tells everyone that if they don't use Rust, they are obsolete. And because nobody is saying "Rust is going to take all our jobs" to all the other programmers. And because most of the threads on HN aren't about Rust on a daily basis.
Sure overly enthusiastic Rust fans exist and they are annoying. But it's nowhere even close to the AI mania gripping the industry.
> Do these people enter threads about what your favorite Rust library is and say they don’t have any and Rust is a bad language?
Yes. And Rust people enter threads about other languages and projects not written in Rust and say they're bad because they aren't Rust. Welcome to Hacker News.
I've been training to naturally ignore AI mentions that I thought this entry was about some HN ui font change (Sans).
The style is a bit off for the usual HN fare: 'sans' should be lowercase here, or otherwise it's easy to confuse for a font. It's still pretty swell :)
I built (well, vibe-coded) a version of this a while back that runs against the Hacker News API, it's static HTML on GitHub Pages so I don't have to run a server for it: https://tools.simonwillison.net/hacker-news-filtered
Love that this is configurable unlike OPs version. That way I can exclude "I rewrote ____ in Rust".
Would be nice to have "include" option... for those of use who may want to ONLY read posts about AI or whatever else niche interest.
interesting but i rarely use any HN reader
there's just something about this UI and its consistency
I also don't mind all the AI related news
If anything I just wish they had a mute/block button. its not fun when somebody is stalking you replying to every comment you make.
How often do you use it?
Immediately I started thinking how nice it would be to use natural language to have LLMs generate a deterministic filter for stories matching content I DO care about, filtered from New. Instead of filtering it out.
I don't use it myself. I built it for a Hacker News thread where someone else was saying "I wish I could browse Hacker News without all the AI stuff".
I have an app that does Hacker News with AI; it analyses all the stories and comments for a number of criteria, and tags them so you can skip stuff you don't want to see. I should get around to actually publishing it but I've been lazy.
One of the fun things I noticed is the psychological impact of framing. A comment that might've made you feel the need to reply before has less emotional weight if it's highlighted in red and a diminished font. Same thing for stories; if you would normally disagree with a story and it would make you want to comment, you feel less like commenting if the story is rated as 'lacking evidence', 'unsupported by research', 'personal anecdotes only', etc. It drives down the feeling of needing to engage. Which is horrible for site engagement, but good for mental health (I think).
My immediate thought was already expressed in one of the few comments:
> Does this use an LLM to categorize "AI-related" vs "not-AI related" articles? Would be ironic. Lol
For one sec, I got excited for a new font!
Coincidently he uses AI to solve this problem
Do you have evidence? I see no indication of this.
I have evidence that it's not AI. It's just a regex.
https://github.com/elijah-potter/blog/blob/master/pages/hnsa...
What would be the worse non-semantic alternative? Regex?
LLMs are the holy grail for getting beyond string matches. I would hope one was used to solve such a problem, otherwise that would be a poor product, right?
I did not investigate the product, but my point here is irony.
I've been thinking of making something like this for myself for quite a while now, glad I'm not the only one who had the idea and someone actually did it before I got to it
Interesting this keeps moving up the front page when the site is inaccessible because it's hosted on a baked potato.
Yep. My single core Proxmox machine sitting in my living room with horrible cache invalidation is struggling.
Sounds like a great use case for serving plain HTTP over cloudflare tunnel. Why terminate TLS when you don't have to?
You know what's funny? Most of this site is exactly that. The _one_ time I do something dynamic…
73% of users vote prior to reading TFA, according to this research. (I am sometimes guilty of this myself)
We live in a world being dimished by confirmation bias, but this isn't a new thing. Those who wrote/approved the headlines always had more power than those who wrote the articles.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315096490_Consumers...
edit: disclaimer, no hate on TFA. Just responding to the comment.
73% of Reddit users vote prior to reading TFA:
> In the present work, we introduce and make available a new dataset containing the activity logs that recorded all activity for 309 Reddit users for one year.
n=309 is better than n=1, but yeah...
However, tracking over a year might make the subject forget about the whole thing, and act naturally. As far as HN vs Reddit, not much difference really. I mean that as more props to reddit users than anything against HNers.
Huh, I didn't even remember to vote for posts, i just scroll down to read (and vote sometimes on comments)
This submission should be studied by people holding clipboards. It needs a follow-up:
"How I made it to the top of HN with zero content beyond a catchy title"
It further proves the key to getting your stuff on HN is not to post interesting content, it's to post something that sounds interesting.
Just goes to show how much demand there is.
HN really needs a containment board.
I'm curious to find out if they're using a model to detect AI content. I'd be more amused than disappointed. But, alas, potato.
I got a partial load and what it looks like it does is just search each submission for a list of key words and discards any that hits, so it would discard this submission.
I would argue that in a small way, this post _is_ about AI, so it wouldn't be a false positive.
I was not suggesting that it would be a false positive, I was suggesting that this will filter out many submissions that would be of interest to those that want less AI on HN. This would flag a blog that has nothing to do with AI if some random person mentioned AI in the comments of that blog post, right?
It's not an LLM.
Why use big program when regex do trick?
You can get the best of both worlds with a small embedding model
Show me an embedding model that runs as fast as an optimized regex engine and I'll buy you a beer.
The filter doesn't appear to be perfect, one of the top posts right now is "My Agent Skill for Test-Driven Development"
I guess they could run the titles through a (flash) LLM to catch ones were keyword detection won't cut it.
Have to love the irony. :)
Was hoping it was a new font.
Hug of death?
yep. standby
While you are at it can you filter out posts to subscription only sites eg economist NYT $&c. We're all here to escape click bait
Hopefully fixed the cache invalidation. I'm crossing my fingers.
Oh. A little bit of a let down. I was expecting "HN without comments and posts written by LLMs".
I have my own version of this as a browser extension paired with a backend that runs all new submissions through a small LLM to classify them, which catches more than a simple word match. Fight fire with fire, as they say.
Though I haven't used it much lately, because seeing half of the front page disappear when I enable it is a bit disheartening.
Are you using AI to figure out what's about what's AI and what's not?
^how about just be a devoted AI section at the top?
Welp, it was only a matter of time. Thank you
A problem is it doesn't load as fast. Could it be helped?
Yes, it can. I am having a major cache invalidation problem. One of the major blights of programmers everywhere.
Yes, please. A general-purpose filter like the one on 4chan would also work.
Maybe HN could have a filter button that hides ANY threads for keywords you choose to filter.
I would instantly hide anything about Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos.
Okay, now filter out the VC stuff too...
I've been thinking the same. Couldn't this be done with a browser extension that hides elements that matches a regex?
Not quite. Lots of articles don't mention AI in the title, even if that is their core subject.
[dead]
Love this. Really nice to see a HN front page without AI, the fatigue is real.