Launch HN: Constellation Space (YC W26) – AI for satellite mission assurance
32 points by kmajid 9 hours ago
32 points by kmajid 9 hours ago
Hi HN! We're Kamran, Raaid, Laith, and Omeed from Constellation Space (https://constellation-io.com/). We built an AI system that predicts satellite link failures before they happen. Here's a video walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=069V9fADAtM.
Between us, we've spent years working on satellite operations at SpaceX, Blue Origin, and NASA. At SpaceX, we managed constellation health for Starlink. At Blue, we worked on next-gen test infra for New Glenn. At NASA, we dealt with deep space communications. The same problem kept coming up: by the time you notice a link is degrading, you've often already lost data.
The core issue is that satellite RF links are affected by dozens of interacting variables. A satellite passes overhead, and you need to predict whether the link will hold for the next few minutes. That depends on: the orbital geometry (elevation angle changes constantly), tropospheric attenuation (humidity affects signal loss via ITU-R P.676), rain fade (calculated via ITU-R P.618 - rain rates in mm/hr translate directly to dB of loss at Ka-band and above), ionospheric scintillation (we track the KP index from magnetometer networks), and network congestion on top of all that.
The traditional approach is reactive. Operators watch dashboards, and when SNR drops below a threshold, they manually reroute traffic or switch to a backup link. With 10,000 satellites in orbit today and 70,000+ projected by 2030, this doesn't scale. Our system ingests telemetry at around 100,000 messages per second from satellites, ground stations, weather radar, IoT humidity sensors, and space weather monitors. We run physics-based models in real-time - the full link budget equations, ITU atmospheric standards, orbital propagation - to compute what should be happening. Then we layer ML models on top, trained on billions of data points from actual multi-orbit operations.
The ML piece is where it gets interesting. We use federated learning because constellation operators (understandably) don't want to share raw telemetry. Each constellation trains local models on their own data, and we aggregate only the high-level patterns. This gives us transfer learning across different orbit types and frequency bands - learnings from LEO Ka-band links help optimize MEO or GEO operations. We can predict most link failures 3-5 minutes out with >90% accuracy, which gives enough time to reroute traffic before data loss. The system is fully containerized (Docker/Kubernetes) and deploys on-premise for air-gapped environments, on GovCloud (AWS GovCloud, Azure Government), or standard commercial clouds.
Right now we're testing with defense and commercial partners. The dashboard shows real-time link health, forecasts at 60/180/300 seconds out, and root cause analysis (is this rain fade? satellite setting below horizon? congestion?). We expose everything via API - telemetry ingestion, predictions, topology snapshots, even an LLM chat endpoint for natural language troubleshooting.
The hard parts we're still working on: prediction accuracy degrades for longer time horizons (beyond 5 minutes gets dicey), we need more labeled failure data for rare edge cases, and the federated learning setup requires careful orchestration across different operators' security boundaries. We'd love feedback from anyone who's worked on satellite ops, RF link modeling, or time-series prediction at scale. What are we missing? What would make this actually useful in a production NOC environment?
Happy to answer any technical questions!
pretty intriguing demo video. how do you ensure your telemetry ingestion happens operationally that will be daunting task. output will be as good as your telemetry any delay or break in data everything bound break. Great point, telemetry reliability is the biggest hurdle for any mission-critical system. We address the "garbage in, garbage out" risk by prioritizing freshness (our pipeline treats latency as a failure). We use a "leaky" buffer strategy (if data is too old to be actionable for a 3-minute forecast, we drop it to ensure the models aren't lagging behind the physical reality of the link), graceful degradation (when telemetry is delayed or broken, the system automatically falls back to physics-only models i.e. orbital propagation and ITU standards), and edge validation (we validate and normalize data at the ingestion point, if a stream becomes corrupted or "noisy," the system flags that specific sensor as unreliable and adjusts the prediction confidence scores in real-time). Rather than longer times, what about short times? I did some work on fast fading and you can see rapid swings in fade over <5s. That is hard for automated systems to respond to, so you normally respond by increasing the link margin. If you can predict this you could reduce the margin needed. That could potentially be very valuable. Spot on. We categorize that <5s window as tactical fade mitigation. Our current 3-5m window is for topology/routing, but the sub-5s window is for Dynamic Link Margin (DLM). If we can predict fast-fading signatures—like tropospheric scintillation or edge-of-cloud diffraction, we can move from reactive to proactive ACM. Is the inference running on-orbit or ground-side? I guess SWaP is a major constraint for the former. Not sure if you are using FPGAs or something like a Jetson? Very cool company! Are y’all hiring? Not right now but we will be soon! Send over your resume to hello@constellation-io.com if you're interested in joining. Are you raising? Not currently, we're planning on opening up our seed round in 4 weeks, feel free to shoot us a note at hello@constellation-io.com if you're interested in learning more. Do you plan to work on orbital weapon systems like Golden Dome? We're big believers in American Dynamism. you could have used a one word answer, yes. the extra words could have been "if we can get it". in other words, you're not opposed to working in the military industrial complex. your reply walks the line of weasel words. trying not to offend those against while nodding to those that approve. you'll do fine as a spokeperson
1yvino - 6 hours ago
kmajid2 - 6 hours ago
verzali - 4 hours ago
kmajid2 - 3 hours ago
dsrtslnd23 - 2 hours ago
free_energy_min - 6 hours ago
kmajid2 - 3 hours ago
JumpCrisscross - 5 hours ago
kmajid2 - 3 hours ago
infinitewars - 4 hours ago
kmajid2 - 3 hours ago
dylan604 - 2 hours ago