Show HN: A word of the day that doesn't suck
39 points by jsomers 19 hours ago
39 points by jsomers 19 hours ago
I’ve long thought that the Word of the Day was a wasted genre. The goal should be to give you words you can use; to enrich your understanding of words you already know; or at least to use words to tell you something neat about the world.
Instead, what you usually get is words that will never be used in conversation, held up as curios. Some examples from Dictionary.com’s daily email: thewless, balladmonger, vagility, contextomy. These words are... not useful.
I’ve always thought I could do better. My friend Ben recently created a daily puzzle game, called Bracket City, launched here on HN [1], which I like because it takes about the same amount of time as Wordle but has some of the variety and artistry of a good crossword.
Ben agreed to let me write a word of the day for the game’s audience. We’ve collected them all here: https://bracket.city/words. It’s such a joy to write -- every day, I pay homage to a word I love or use or have newly discovered. I find myself paying more attention to words I encounter, thinking if they deserve a place.
It’s also fun for another reason. Many years ago I wrote a blog post, "You’re probably using the wrong dictionary" [2], that made the rounds and actually still finds new readers today. It was about how the modern-day dictionaries we find by default on our iPhones and web browsers are actually kind of bureaucratic and lifeless. Through a writer I love, John McPhee, I rediscovered Webster’s 1913 dictionary, which feels like it was written by a thinking person who loved words. I still consult it all the time. Writing a word of the day has reminded me just how delightful and useful Webster’s old dictionary is -- and reacquainted me with the OED, which I now look to every day, and which I discovered you can access with your library card.
Some of my favorite entries so far: sophisticated, twee, gravitas, blockbuster, meteorologist, send, bid. There are more than 175 now -- and more coming once a day, every day, for as long as Bracket City stands.
To sign up to see each word of the day as it’s published, go to https://bracket.city/words.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43622719
[2] https://jsomers.net/blog/dictionary
When it comes to getting a deeper understanding of words you already know, two of my favorite resources are Etymonline [1] and the 1913 edition of Webster’s dictionary [2]. And if you’re curious why 1913 specifically, this post [3] gives a great overview. [1] https://www.etymonline.com/ The 3rd post was written by the OP! Hahah how did I miss that! It’s even linked in the description. Glad you pointed it out. Let me also link the word enjoyers out there to another favorite of mine, then: https://carefulwords.com/ Using the Wrong Dictionary (2014) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37368505 - Sept 2023 (33 comments) You’re probably using the wrong dictionary (2014) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35635876 - April 2023 (1 comment) Using the wrong dictionary (2014) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29734242 - Dec 2021 (170 comments) You’re probably using the wrong dictionary (2014) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19763435 - April 2019 (87 comments) You're probably using the wrong dictionary - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9294518 - March 2015 (2 comments) Using the wrong dictionary - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7772557 - May 2014 (138 comments) Related: Thank HN: The puzzle game I posted here 6 weeks ago got licensed by The Atlantic - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43622719 - April 2025 (169 comments) Show HN: Bracket City – A daily, exploded (?) crossword puzzle - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43160542 - Feb 2025 (53 comments) Nice, anoter James Somers blog post/project, I like. Love your articles, dude. And have a bunch on my reading list to catch up on. what would make a "word of the day" stream compelling to me would be a word that reflected recent news. William Safire did this to some extent in his weekly column in the NY Times and it was usually pretty interesting. a way to increase the discovery of relevance could be looking up the etymologies of words that pop up, I'm always fascinated by how complex and interesting etymologies are No cap, but the first ten-ish were already well known to me. Might be worth mentioning you're pitching below not-particularly-well-read this guy. With entries like "marketing" the point must be in the elaboration and not in the introduction of the word Bruh said "no cap" on HN > Bruh Those who live in glass houses should not attempt to hang paintings, methinks. Could it be at all possible that I did that on purpose? Perchance I chose to make the exact "mistake" the GP made, and call him out for it at the same time because the irony of it would be funny? You must think other people are deeply, abysmally, troglodytically stupid if you thought one could make that comment without self-awareness. Maybe you did, maybe you didn't. If you did, then maybe you did not do a very good job of communicating that? I mean, until telepathy over TCP finally arrives, all we have to go on is basically ASCII. > You must think other people are deeply, abysmally, troglodytically stupid if you thought one could make that comment without self-awareness. I suspect you inhabit a different part of the Internet than me. I envy you. They could use those little sticky velcro 'Commander' strips and it would work out ok I think it would be interesting to incorporate loan words or phrases. Often these words become loan words because there's no good English equivalents so loan words/phrases sort of expand our ability to grapple these concepts.
seabass - 13 hours ago
rjh29 - 6 hours ago
seabass - 2 hours ago
dang - an hour ago
dang - 14 hours ago
deepzn - 7 hours ago
fsckboy - 11 hours ago
Y_Y - 14 hours ago
wahnfrieden - 14 hours ago
Dilettante_ - 14 hours ago
janfoeh - 13 hours ago
Dilettante_ - 12 hours ago
janfoeh - 9 hours ago
1attice - 13 hours ago
wnc3141 - 14 hours ago